| | (This topic still fascinates me -- even if it does piss me off.)
Obviously there are people posing as dominants (the "kneel bitch!"
brigade) who expect submissive women to be doormats for them. (Has
anyone noticed that describing themselves as "not a doormat" has kept
these guys away? Anybody? Bueller?)
I've never seen a single submissive, one who is actively seeking a
dominant or active in the BDSM or ownership subculture, not a single
one, who I would describe as a doormat.
Not one.
That's not saying it's impossible for them to exist, of course, but I
think it says something about how frequently they occur. In contrast,
discussions about submission reliably bring up the "doormat" thing,
constantly, to the point where you'd think the Scene was, well,
carpeted with them.
What does exist, though, maybe not as plentifully as the mythical
doormat, but in fairly good numbers, are those of us who choose not to
seek a life with limits on our submission, and who choose to challenge
the experience of surrendering choices and ego and the validation of
the BDSM scene for our submission and our relationships.
WE are what people in the general BDSM scene refer to as doormats.
They're talking about us. And, they are doing it in a way that props up
a precious illusion -- the illusion that there's nothing between Scene
submission, and being a useless, unhealthy, unintelligent doormat.
|
| | Posted 9/11/2008 7:55 PM - 95 Views - 0 eProps - 0 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |